Enhanced Care Management Outcomes

What the evidence shows, and what our own program data show.

Two things are worth separating. The first is the published evidence on California’s Enhanced Care Management benefit as a whole. The second is what Institute on Aging’s own Acute Care Transitions program has produced. Both are on this page, with sources.

The statewide evidence on ECM

Peer-reviewed and state evaluations show that Enhanced Care Management lowers acute care use, improves mental health, and pays for itself.

52%

fewer emergency department visits

26%

fewer inpatient hospital stays

21%

more outpatient and preventive visits

4.0 pt

drop in PHQ-9 depression score

9 of 12

Community Supports already proven cost-effective, with net cost reductions up to roughly 80% versus institutional care

227,500

members served by ECM statewide in Q3 2025 alone, up 59% year over year

Institute on Aging ACT program results

576 participants enrolled through Acute Care Transitions, July 1, 2025 to May 31, 2026.

65%

of referred patients enroll

88%

stayed engaged beyond the first 30 days

64%

completed a full episode of care

14

acute care settings

Who we are reaching

ACT participants are not the population most people picture when they hear “aging services.” They are working-age and older adults whose health is being shaped by housing, behavioral health, and repeated acute episodes.

How we measure

Institute on Aging evaluates ACT using the RE-AIM framework, which measures reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. The evaluation runs across three aims.

Aim 1. Utilization, engagement, and housing
Thirty-day readmissions, avoidable emergency department use, engagement, and time to housing, compared against concurrent non-enrolled clients, a pre-implementation group, and community-referral ECM clients.

Aim 2. Client and care team experience
Interviews with enrolled and non-participating clients, plus surveys and interviews with care teams and partners on workflow, fidelity, and partnership.

Aim 3. Cost-effectiveness
Program costs weighed against inpatient, emergency department, and observation utilization at standardized rates, with cost-effectiveness ratios, return on investment, and sensitivity testing.

Sources

Lu D, et al. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2026;41(5):1222–1228.
California Department of Health Care Services, Cost-Effectiveness of Medi-Cal Community Supports Fact Sheet (2026).
California Department of Health Care Services, New Data Reinforce California’s Commitment to Whole-Person Medi-Cal Care (2025).
Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA. New England Journal of Medicine. 2009;360(14):1418–1428.
AHRQ HCUP Statistical Brief #304 (2023).
Institute on Aging, Characteristics of ECM Acute Care Participants (CaseWorthy records), July 1, 2025 to May 31, 2026. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.